Blog
  /  
Business Basics
  /  
Workplace trends to watch: How distributed work and automation are revolutionizing midsize business

Workplace trends to watch: How distributed work and automation are revolutionizing midsize business

Michael Davis
Contributing writer, BILL
illustrated button and cursor with the words business basicsHeader imageHeader imageHeader imageHeader image
Table of contents
Get more from BILL
Subscribe to finance insights and thought leadership content delivered straight to your inbox.
By continuing, you agree to BILL's Terms of Service and Privacy Notice.

Even before the pandemic, remote jobs were a growing workplace trend. Virtual assistants were on the rise, medical coders made good money from home, and accounting firms could oversee their clients’ books by logging in online, without ever leaving the office.

Today, the demand for remote work is higher than ever. But there’s a big difference between “remote work” and the kind of streamlined, distributed workforce that can scale competitively.

If you’re considering more permanent work-from-home (or hybrid) options for your team, it’s important to understand the difference between remote and distributed workplace trends—and how midsize businesses are using the latter to outpace the competition.

What’s the difference between remote work and a distributed work environment?

The term “remote” work simply means that people can work, well, remotely. This is synonymous with the term “work from home.”

At first blush, the term “distributed work environment” sounds like it’s the same thing. People can work together despite being distributed across different locations.

But there are two main differences between these terms that change everything.

The first of these lies in the mentality behind them. During pandemic lockdowns, many companies were forced to let their employees do their jobs at home. It was either that, or not do them at all. Companies didn’t want to do it. They had to do it.

For many of these—including a surprising number of tech companies—the idea of a “normal” work environment never changed. People working at home were seen as having to “make do,” and their teams, or at least their managers, couldn’t wait for health precautions to be lifted so everyone could “get back to normal.”

Other companies, however, weren’t satisfied by making do. They wanted to figure out how to turn this new circumstance into a competitive advantage.

Instead of trying to do their jobs in the same way at home, they created truly distributed teams—groups that could work together better than they had in the office, using technologies designed specifically for distant collaboration.

For those companies, distributed teams are more than the new norm. They’re the future. They’re streamlined, efficient, and highly effective. Better yet, they’re scalable, which is the other major difference between “remote” work and a “distributed work environment.”

Distributed work environments are poised for rapid growth.

What are the advantages of a distributed work environment?

Because a distributed work environment is designed to let people work from anywhere, it takes advantage of another key workplace trend—the tendency among top Gen Z and Millennial talent to prioritize flexible, remote work arrangements.

In fact, these tech-savvy individuals are more than happy to leave one employer for another to find opportunities that fit their lifestyle. And companies that have embraced a distributed work environment are happy to snap them up.

From a financial perspective, a distributed work environment also reduces the tremendous overhead of maintaining a physical office. By letting go of those spaces, telework saves these companies an average of $10,000 per employee per year in real-estate costs alone.

But it’s important not to downplay the challenges of moving to a distributed work environment. Beyond the mental shift—which can be a significant obstacle—many companies are mired in paper-based back-office operations, making any move away from a centralized office feel overwhelming if not impossible.

From filing systems to check payments that require physical approvals and signatures, companies need to escape their paper shackles if they want to step into more streamlined, distributed operations.

Using cloud-based technology to make the transition

With the prevalence of tools like Zoom, Slack, and Google Workspace, distant communication is fairly easy to achieve. Cloud-based documents have largely replaced printed memos, and cloud-based video recordings let people “attend” meetings hours or even days later.

But what about back-office operations? Fortunately, modern back-office systems are primed for cloud-based distribution—popular systems that most midsize businesses are already using.

For example, many business accounting systems are based in the cloud, and the tools that integrate with those systems are specifically designed to help back-office operations transition into a digital, distributed environment.

By adding cloud-based tools like BILL—designed to digitize, automate, and streamline AP workflows—companies can transition their back-office operations into fully distributed systems that are much faster and more efficient than their paper-based counterparts.

Using automation to scale the advantage

Another major advantage to embracing cloud-based, distributed systems is the potential to add automation for mundane, routine tasks.

Invoice approvals, for example, follow strict rules as to who needs to approve what—according to specific vendors, departments, threshold amounts, etc.

Automation can route those approvals to the right people, saving human beings the time of distributing approval requests, following up by email, collecting the approvals, and storing them. Approvals can be collected and stored digitally, in a time-stamped audit trail, with different levels of visibility depending on a user’s role in the system.

Invoices themselves can be entered automatically and displayed for review rather than depending on human beings to type them in by hand. With the right system integrations, that single invoice entry can flow through the process of approval and payment and even sync with accounting software, eliminating the need (and potential human error) of manual double entry.

How to implement a distributed work environment for AP professionals

If you want to take advantage of a fully distributed work environment, it’s important to transition any paper-based systems to cloud-based systems. Otherwise, you’ll end up with a team of disconnected, remote workers who are still relying on paper and struggling to work in the same old way.

Fortunately, paper-based, back-office systems can be migrated to an integrated, cloud-based tech stack no matter what your current situation is—whether your team is still in a physical office or already working from home.

To learn more about cloud-based, back-office systems and automated AP, read this next:

Author
Michael Davis
Contributing writer, BILL
Michael specializes in helping businesses optimize financial operations by staying up-to-date with industry trends and translating insights into real-world applications. With expertise in AP, cash flow, and fintech, Michael breaks down complex topics to help businesses continue to grow.
Author
Michael Davis
Contributing writer, BILL
Michael specializes in helping businesses optimize financial operations by staying up-to-date with industry trends and translating insights into real-world applications. With expertise in AP, cash flow, and fintech, Michael breaks down complex topics to help businesses continue to grow.
Get more from BILL
Subscribe to finance insights and thought leadership content delivered straight to your inbox.
By continuing, you agree to BILL's Terms of Service and Privacy Notice.

Frequently asked questions

Dashboard mockup

Ready to bring AI to your finance team?

Take a demo with BILL to see how our integrated platform can provide your business with seamless AP, AR, and spend and expense management.

Request a Demo
The information provided on this page does not, and is not intended to constitute legal or financial advice and is for general informational purposes only. The content is provided "as-is"; no representations are made that the content is error free.

Software Comparison

BILL Spend & Expense
Best for AI expense automation
4.5 on G2
  • Smart corporate cards with real-time tracking, flexible limits, and instant visibility into every transaction across your team [1]
  • Unlimited free virtual cards with unique numbers for each vendor or subscription—freeze, delete, or set custom limits instantly to prevent overcharges and reduce fraud risk [5]
  • AI-powered auto-categorization and receipt matching that connects card transactions and expenses into a single reconciliation workflow [1]
  • Customizable budgets with spend controls based on merchant, amount, receipt requirements, and configurable approval workflows [3]
  • Auto-freeze on cards with incomplete transactions, ensuring receipts and documentation are captured before additional spend is approved [1]
  • Up to 7x points on restaurants, 5x on hotels, 2x on recurring software, and 1.5x on all other purchases (rates shown are for weekly or daily billing cycle; rates vary by billing frequency) [2]
  • Two-way sync with QuickBooks, NetSuite, Sage Intacct, Xero, and Microsoft Dynamics; additional integrations with Acumatica, Slack, and HRIS platforms [1]
  • Pro: $0/user/month with all features included—no paid tier to unlock [4]
  • Pro: Merchant controls and auto-freeze cards at no extra cost [1]
  • Pro: Credit lines that don't fluctuate daily based on bank balance [4]
  • Pro: All ERP integrations (NetSuite, Sage Intacct, Xero) included free [1]
  • Con: 12-month holding period before rewards can be redeemed [2]
  • Con: Category reward multipliers cap at $5,000/month per category [2]
  • Con: Less established in global, enterprise-scale expense programs with multi-country regulatory requirements

BILL Spend & Expense pairs corporate cards with AI-powered expense management and budget controls in a single platform at no cost—teams aren't paying per user or upgrading to unlock features that competitors gate behind paid tiers.

Merchant-level spend controls and auto-freeze on incomplete transactions give admins granular oversight without manual policing, and two-way ERP integrations are included free where Ramp and Brex charge for NetSuite and Sage Intacct access. The main trade-off is an initial 12-month rewards holding period before accumulated points can be redeemed. [1][2][3][4]

Commonly compared to: Ramp and Brex (for card-first expense management), and SAP Concur (for enterprise expense programs).

Pricing
$0/user/month with no annual fee
Integrations
Two-way sync with QuickBooks, NetSuite, Sage Intacct, Xero, and Microsoft
Ideal company size
SMB to mid-market
SAP Concur
Best for large enterprises
4 on G2
  • AI-powered receipt capture via ExpenseIt on the SAP Concur mobile app, with smart matching that combines credit card charges and e-receipts into expense reports automatically [7]
  • Configurable approval workflows with built-in audit rules that flag policy exceptions, plus optional Intelligent Audit and Verify add-ons for automated compliance checks [6][7]
  • Modular product suite: Concur Expense, Concur Travel, and Concur Invoice are separate products that can be purchased individually or together, so organizations can start with expense management and add capabilities over time [6]
  • Bank card feed integrations that import corporate card transactions directly into expense reports for automatic reconciliation [6]
  • Joule, SAP's AI assistant, for expense report review, spend analysis, and cost estimation [6]
  • Budget tracking and monitoring tools that give finance teams visibility into spend against departmental or project-level budgets [6]
  • Support for global operations with multi-currency expense reporting and country-specific tax and regulatory compliance tools [6]
  • Pro: 300+ pre-built integrations including native SAP ERP sync [7][8]
  • Pro: Global coverage with multi-currency and regulatory compliance tools [6]
  • Pro: Modular—add travel or invoice management without switching platforms [6]
  • Pro: AI-powered receipt capture and smart matching via ExpenseIt [7]
  • Con: Quote-based pricing; no published rates on the website [6]
  • Con: No corporate card offering; relies on bank card feed integrations [6]
  • Con: Implementation can be complex for smaller organizations [6]
  • Con: Live support requires purchasing the User Support Desk service [6]

SAP Concur is the incumbent in expense management software, with the largest partner ecosystem and broadest global footprint on this list. Its modular approach gives large organizations flexibility to start with expense management and layer on travel or invoice capabilities independently.

The trade-off is complexity—pricing is opaque, there's no corporate card offering, and smaller teams may find the platform more than they need. Organizations already in the SAP ecosystem will get the most value from native S/4HANA integration. [6][7][8]

Commonly compared to: BILL (for SMB expense management), and Coupa (for enterprise spend management).

  • Best for: Mid-market and enterprise organizations that need a globally scalable expense management platform with configurable compliance tools and a large partner ecosystem. [6][7][8]
  • Highlights: AI-powered receipt capture via ExpenseIt, configurable approval workflows with built-in audit rules, optional Intelligent Audit and Verify add-ons for automated compliance checks, 300+ app integrations, and native SAP ERP sync. [6][7][8]
  • Ideal if you need: An expense platform that integrates natively with SAP S/4HANA or other enterprise ERPs, with the flexibility to add modules like Concur Travel or Concur Invoice over time. [6][7]
Pricing
Quote-based
Integrations
QuickBooks, Xero, Sage,TSheets, Gusto, & most business credit cards.
Ideal Company Size
Mid-market to enterprise
Ramp
Best for a broad spend platform
4.8 on G2
  • Corporate cards with customizable spend controls by merchant, category, employee, or department, plus unlimited virtual and physical cards [9][10]
  • AI-powered receipt matching, transaction coding, and memo suggestions that auto-populate as soon as a card is swiped [9]
  • Policy agent that reviews every expense against company policy, auto-approves compliant transactions, and escalates only exceptions with full audit trail [9]
  • Expense submission via SMS, Slack, or Microsoft Teams in addition to web and mobile app [9]
  • Reimbursements for out-of-pocket expenses paid to employees' bank accounts in 1–2 business days [9]
  • Real-time spend reporting with custom dashboards, natural-language queries, and proactive overspend alerts [9]
  • Broader spend platform that includes AP automation, procurement, vendor management, and treasury alongside expense management [9]
  • Pro: Free plan includes corporate cards, expenses, and bill pay [11]
  • Pro: AI policy agent reviews 100% of expenses automatically [9]
  • Pro: Submit expenses via SMS, Slack, or Teams—no app required [9]
  • Pro: Broader spend platform covers AP, procurement, and vendor management [9]
  • Con: Budget tracking requires Ramp Plus at $15/user/month [11]
  • Con: NetSuite, Sage Intacct, and Dynamics integrations require a paid plan [11]
  • Con: HRIS syncs and auto-lock cards require a paid plan [11]
  • Con: Credit limits fluctuate daily based on connected bank balance [12]

Ramp's strength is breadth—it's not just an expense tool but a full spend management platform that includes AP automation, procurement, and vendor management alongside expenses. The AI policy agent is a differentiator, reviewing every transaction against company rules rather than relying on manual manager approvals.

The trade-off is that several features mid-market teams rely on—budget tracking, ERP integrations beyond QuickBooks and Xero, and HRIS syncs—require upgrading to Ramp Plus at $15/user/month plus a platform fee. [9][11]

Commonly compared to: Brex and BILL (for corporate cards and expense management), and SAP Concur (for enterprise expense programs).

  • Best for: Fast-growing companies that want corporate cards, expense management, and accounts payable on a single platform with AI-powered automation. [9][10]
  • Highlights: Corporate cards with built-in spend controls, AI-powered receipt matching and expense coding, a policy agent that reviews 100% of expenses and flags only exceptions, and submission via SMS, Slack, or Microsoft Teams. [9][10]
  • Ideal if you need: A card-first platform where expense management is one part of a larger system that also covers AP, procurement, and vendor management. [9]
Pricing
$0/user/month
Integrations
QuickBooks, NetSuite, Xero, Sage Intacct, Slack, & 100+ accounting tools.
Ideal Company Size
Startups to mid-market
Brex
Best for global teams
4.8 on G2
  • Corporate cards with customizable spend limits by role, department, or category, plus auto-approve for in-policy expenses and auto-decline for out-of-policy spend [13][14]
  • AI-powered expense reviews that auto-approve compliant transactions and surface only exceptions for human review, with clear visibility into why a transaction is flagged [13]
  • Auto-generated receipts and memos with OCR that matches receipts in any language or currency, plus automatic GL coding by department, project, and entity [13]
  • Live Budgets that let department heads set top-level budgets, provision spend to individuals or teams, and track usage in real time with anomaly detection [13]
  • Global reimbursements in 70+ countries in employees' local currency, with subsidiaries able to issue reimbursements from local bank accounts [13]
  • Expense submission and approval via Slack and WhatsApp, with in-app commenting on individual transactions [13]
  • Broader financial platform that includes bill pay, business banking with up to 3.68% yield, and treasury alongside expense management [14]
  • Pro: Free plan includes corporate cards, expenses, bill pay, and travel [15]
  • Pro: AI expense reviews with 99% average policy compliance rate [14]
  • Pro: Global reimbursements in 70+ countries in local currency [13]
  • Pro: Live Budgets with real-time tracking and anomaly detection [13]
  • Con: Live Budgets require Premium at $12/user/month [15]
  • Con: HRIS syncs and customizable ERP integrations require a paid plan [15]
  • Con: Credit limits fluctuate daily based on connected bank balance [16]
  • Con: Multiple expense policies and dynamic review chains require Premium [15]

Brex positions itself as a full financial stack for startups—cards, expenses, banking, and treasury in one platform. The AI expense reviews and 99% average compliance rate (per Brex's internal metrics) are notable, and the global reimbursement coverage across 70+ countries is broader than most competitors on this list.

Like Ramp, Brex gates budget management and HRIS integrations behind a paid tier, and credit limits fluctuate daily based on your bank balance. Teams that need predictable spending power or are past the startup stage may find the pricing structure adds up. [13][14][15]

Commonly compared to: Ramp and BILL (for corporate cards and expense management), and SAP Concur (for enterprise expense programs).

  • Best for: Startups and high-growth companies that want a global financial platform covering corporate cards, expense management, bill pay, and business banking. [13][14]
  • Highlights: AI-powered expense reviews that auto-approve compliant transactions, corporate cards with built-in policy controls, Live Budgets for real-time tracking, global reimbursements in 70+ countries, and OCR receipt matching in any language or currency. [13][14]
  • Ideal if you need: A financial platform built for startups that includes expense management as part of a broader stack with banking, treasury, and AP. [13][14]
Pricing
$0/user/month
Integrations
NetSuite, QuickBooks, Workday,SAP Concur, Slack, & global banking portals.
Ideal Company Size
Startups to mid-market
Expensify
Best for simple reimbursements
4.5 on G2
  • SmartScan receipt capture by photo, email forwarding (receipts@expensify.com), or text message; auto-extracts transaction details and categorizes expenses [17]
  • Bring-your-own-card support: link existing corporate cards from 10,000+ banks globally for automatic reconciliation without switching card providers [17]
  • Expensify Visa Commercial Card with cash back on US purchases; cash back first offsets the Expensify subscription cost, then flows to the company's bank account [17]
  • Concierge AI for automated expense categorization, policy violation flagging, rule enforcement, and error reduction [17]
  • Global reimbursements for employees and independent contractors in their local currency [17]
  • Chat-based collaboration directly on individual expenses to resolve questions in real time rather than through email follow-ups [17]
  • 45+ integrations including QuickBooks, NetSuite, Sage Intacct, Xero, Workday, and Gusto [17]
  • Pro: Bring-your-own-card from 10,000+ banks globally [17]
  • Pro: Expensify Card cash back can offset the subscription cost [17]
  • Pro: SmartScan receipt capture by photo, email, or text message [17]
  • Pro: 45+ integrations including major ERPs and payroll systems [17]
  • Con: No free plan; starts at $5/user/month [18]
  • Con: Pricing structure varies by card spend volume [18]
  • Con: Budget management, advanced approvals, and expense policies require Collect or Control plans [17]
  • Con: No department-level budget management on par with card-first platforms

Expensify's strength is accessibility—it has the lowest barrier to entry for teams that just need to start tracking expenses and submitting receipts. The bring-your-own-card support from 10,000+ banks means companies don't have to switch card providers, and the SmartScan receipt capture (by photo, email, or text) is one of the more flexible input methods on this list.

The trade-off is that several features mid-market teams expect—budget management, advanced approvals, and expense policies—require upgrading to the Collect or Control plans, and spend controls are primarily limited to the Expensify Card rather than extending across all connected cards. [17][18]

Commonly compared to: Zoho Expense (for budget-friendly expense management), and BILL and Ramp (for integrated cards and expenses).

  • Best for: Small and midsize businesses that want a mobile-first expense management tool with flexible card options, including the ability to link existing corporate cards from 10,000+ banks. [17]
  • Highlights: SmartScan receipt capture by photo, email, or text message; bring-your-own-card support from 10,000+ banks globally; Expensify Visa Commercial Card with cash back that offsets subscription costs; and Concierge AI for automated categorization and policy enforcement. [17]
  • Ideal if you need: A lower-cost entry point for expense management where employees can start submitting receipts immediately without switching corporate card providers. [17]
Pricing
From $5/user/month
Integrations
QuickBooks, Xero, Sage, TSheets, Gusto, & most business credit cards.
Ideal Company Size
Small to mid-market
Zoho Expense
Best for budget-conscious teams
4.5 on G2
  • Autoscan receipt capture with OCR that auto-categorizes and itemizes each expense, plus the ability to split or tag expenses across departments, projects, or cost centers [19][20]
  • Automated per diem calculations with pre-defined rules based on country, location, and trip details for regional compliance [20]
  • Corporate card management with real-time feeds that automatically match transactions to uploaded receipts for faster reconciliation [20]
  • Mileage tracking with four input methods across Android, iPhone, and Apple Watch [20]
  • Configurable approval workflows, expense policies, and audit rules with detailed audit trails for compliance [19][20]
  • Custom modules, workflow automation, webhooks, and configurable UI elements for businesses that need tailored expense processes [19]
  • Active-user pricing model: only employees who actually create expenses are charged, so admins and approvers who don't submit reports are free [21]
  • Pro: Free plan available for up to 3 users with core expense tracking [21]
  • Pro: Active-user pricing—admins and approvers aren't charged [21]
  • Pro: Automated per diem calculations by country and location [20]
  • Pro: Deep customization with custom modules and workflow automation [19]
  • Con: Corporate card feeds and multi-level approvals require Standard plan [21]
  • Con: Deepest value requires the broader Zoho ecosystem (Books, People, CRM) [19]
  • Con: No corporate card offering; relies on connecting existing cards [20]
  • Con: Travel booking, per diem, and live budgets require Premium plan [21]

Zoho Expense offers unusually deep customization at a low price point—custom modules, workflow automation, webhooks, and configurable UI elements that most competitors don't expose. The active-user pricing model is genuinely cost-effective for companies where only a portion of employees submit expenses regularly.

The trade-off is that there's no corporate card offering—you'll need to connect your existing cards—and the platform delivers its deepest value when used alongside other Zoho products like Zoho Books and Zoho People. [19][20][21]

Commonly compared to: Expensify (for budget-friendly expense management), and SAP Concur (for global compliance and customization).

  • Best for: Small and midsize businesses that want an affordable, highly customizable expense management platform with strong global compliance features and active-user pricing. [19][20][21]
  • Highlights: Autoscan receipt capture with OCR, automated per diem calculations by country and location, corporate card reconciliation with real-time feeds, mileage tracking across multiple input methods, and active-user pricing starting at $4/user/month. [19][20][21]
  • Ideal if you need: A low-cost expense management tool with deep customization options and native integration with the broader Zoho ecosystem (Zoho Books, Zoho People, Zoho CRM). [19][20]
Pricing
Free (3 users); from $4/user/month
Integrations
Zoho Books, QuickBooks, Xero, Sage, Microsoft Dynamics, & Google Workspace.
Ideal Company Size
Small to mid-market