Home
  /  
Learning Center
  /  
Understanding internal control over financial reporting (ICFR)

Understanding internal control over financial reporting (ICFR)

Josh Krissansen
Contributor
Table of contents
Get more from BILL
Subscribe to finance insights and thought leadership content delivered straight to your inbox.
By continuing, you agree to BILL's Terms of Service and Privacy Notice.

When it comes to financial reporting, accuracy and trust go hand in hand. But for many businesses, keeping reports both compliant and error-free is easier said than done. Whether it's the risk of fraud, inconsistent data, or mounting pressure during month-end close, these challenges can expose a business to serious risk.

That’s where Internal Control over Financial Reporting (ICFR) comes in. By establishing clear checks, processes, and safeguards, ICFR helps ensure financial statements reflect a company’s true financial health—while reducing the risk of costly mistakes, delays, or compliance issues.

Key takeaways

Internal Control over Financial Reporting (ICFR) is a system companies use to make sure their financial reports are accurate.

The COSO framework is a popular guide that helps companies build and assess their ICFR systems.

An effective ICFR system helps prevent mistakes and fraud, which keeps financial reporting trustworthy and reliable.

What is internal control over financial reporting (ICFR)?

Internal control over financial reporting (ICFR) refers to the systems and processes a company puts in place to make sure its financial reports are accurate and trustworthy. These controls help ensure that financial statements reflect the company’s true financial health and follow the correct accounting standards.

Designed and maintained by management, ICFR helps prevent and detect errors or fraud, reduces the risk of material misstatements, and supports compliance with applicable laws, regulations, and accounting standards. 

In this guide, we’ll explore the critical role that ICFR plays in safeguarding assets and maintaining stakeholder trust.

Components of an effective ICFR framework 

An effective internal control over financial reporting (ICFR) framework provides a structure for:

  • Managing financial reporting risks
  • Maintaining accuracy
  • Complying with regulatory requirements

The COSO framework

Most companies rely on the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) framework as the foundation for both building and evaluating their ICFR systems.

It's the most widely recognized model for designing, implementing, and assessing internal controls. The COSO framework outlines five interrelated components that work together to support effective and reliable financial reporting

  1. Control environment: This includes management’s integrity, ethical values, commitment to competence, and the overall structure and authority within the organization.
  2. Risk assessment: This involves identifying and analyzing risks that could result in material misstatements in financial reporting, including both internal and external risks.
  3. Control activities: These are specific policies and procedures implemented to help mitigate financial reporting risks, such as reconciliations, approval processes, and access restrictions.
  4. Information and communication: Accurate and timely information ensures that employee understand their control responsibilities and that those responsible for making decisions receive the insights they need to act.
  5. Monitoring activities: This includes ongoing evaluations, audits, and reviews that are necessary to assess the effectiveness of existing controls and identify areas that need to be adapted as the business and risk landscapes evolve.

ICFR doesn’t operate in a vacuum.

It should be integrated into the company’s broader ERM (enterprise risk management) strategy. By aligning financial controls with company-wide risk practices, you’ll improve visibility, strengthen accountability, and enhance the company’s ability to respond to change while maintaining reporting integrity.

Examples of control activities 

Examples of control activities that businesses implement as part of ICFR include:

  • Segregation of duties
  • Authorization of transactions 
  • Physical controls like safeguarding assets and preventing unauthorized access
  • Comparing and reconciling accounting records with physical assets or third-party data, ensuring accuracy

Benefits of effective ICFR 

An effective internal control over financial reporting framework helps organizations:

  • Improve accuracy and reliability, ensuring financial transactions are recorded consistently and accurately
  • Prevent fraud and error at all levels
  • Maintain compliance with law and regulations like the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX)
  • Drive operational efficiency by streamlining processes and reducing redundancy
  • Protect assets from theft, misuse, or loss

Objectives and importance of ICFR 

ICFR plays a crucial role in ensuring that a company’s financial data is trustworthy, complete, and accurate.

It goes beyond compliance, supporting stronger governance, better decision-making, and sustained investor confidence.

ICFR has three primary objectives:

  1. Ensuring the reliability of financial reporting by producing accurate, timely financial statements that faithfully reflect the organization’s actual position.
  2. Preventing and detecting errors or fraud, and minimizing the risk of material misstatements
  3. Supporting compliance with accounting standards and regulations like GAAP, IFRS, and SOX 

ICFR’s impact on financial statement reliability 

A strong ICFR builds confidence (both internal and external) in the accuracy and integrity of financial reporting. When financial statements can be trusted, companies are in a better position to secure funding, maintain their reputation, and avoid costly restatements or penalties resulting from errors.

ICFR also improves audit readiness by ensuring accurate record-keeping and enhances long-term performance through strong accountability and better risk visibility.

Conducting an ICFR Audit 

Auditing your ICFR is a critical process for ensuring that the controls you have in place are properly designed and are operating effectively.

Whether you conduct the audit internally or contract external auditors, the goal here is to assess whether your financial reporting system is capable of detecting material misstatements.

Here are the steps involved in the typical audit:

  1. Scoping and risk assessment: Identify significant accounts, processes, and financial reporting risks. Focus on the areas most likely to contain material misstatements, such as revenue recognition, inventory valuation, complex estimates, or high-volume transaction cycles.
  2. Documenting and processes and controls: Map out key processes, including any control activities tied to each financial statement assertion (e.g, completeness or accuracy).
  3. Evaluating control design: Assess whether your controls are designed appropriately to address the identified risks, or whether they need to be strengthened or redesigned.
  4. Testing operating effectiveness: Perform walkthroughs and sample testing to confirm whether controls are functioning as intended over a relevant period.
  5. Identifying and evaluating deficiencies: This stage involves documenting control gaps or failures, determining whether they are significant or material, and evaluating how those gaps or failures impact financial reporting. 
  6. Reporting results: Finally, you’ll provide conclusions on the effectiveness of your ICFR. Public companies must disclose any material weaknesses identified. 

Common challenges faced during the audit process

Audits aren’t always as seamless and smooth-flowing as we would like them to be. These are some of the most common challenges finance teams face in performing ICFR audits:

  • Incomplete or undocumented controls that are difficult to evaluate or test
  • Limited ownership or internal resources
  • Outdated processes and manual workflows
  • Changing regulatory expectations that require adaptation 
  • Difficulty in assessing IT controls, especially around financial systems and data security
Confidently automate and control your business with BILL.

The role of independent auditors in assessing ICFR

Public companies have much stricter (compared to their private counterparts) reporting requirements. 

Independent auditors performing an audit on public companies are required under SOX Section 404(b) to formally assess and report on the effectiveness of ICFR at the organization. This includes:

  • Conducting an objective evaluation of the design and operation of key controls
  • Testing for compliance with regulatory standards (e.g., PCAOB guidelines)
  • Reporting material weaknesses or deficiencies to management and the audit committee
  • Offering recommendations to improve control effectiveness and reduce risk

This is not a requirement for private companies, though external auditors may still conduct control assessments to support a more efficient financial statement audit.

Identifying and addressing material weaknesses in ICFR 

If you’ve got this far, you’ve likely noticed we’ve talked a lot about material weaknesses.

Let’s explore what we mean by that.

A material weakness is a deficiency (or a combination thereof) in IFCR that creates a reasonable possibility that a misstatement of the company’s financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

Basically, it is a gap in a company’s IFCR framework that leaves the company vulnerable to the possibility of misstating its true financial position. Naturally, this is a major issue, especially for public companies.

Common examples of material weaknesses include:

  • Inadequate segregation of duties in financial processes
  • Lack of qualified personnel to prepare financial statements
  • Ineffective review of journal entries or account reconciliations
  • Failure to implement or enforce key controls over revenue recognition or expense reporting
  • Incomplete or inaccurate financial reporting due to system limitations

The consequences of such weaknesses, and of failing to address them, can include adverse audit opinions, regulatory penalties for non-compliance, loss of investor or lender trust, restatements of financial results, and damage to brand reputation.

For public companies, disclosure of unresolved material weaknesses is mandatory and can significantly impact share price and market perception. For these reasons, finance teams work quickly to remediate such weakness, implementing strategies such as:

  • Identify why the weakness occurs (root cause analysis)
  • Redesigning or strengthening controls to reduce risk and enhance oversight
  • Improving documentation, control procedures, and training programs
  • Investing in financial systems that improve reporting accuracy, data access, and control automation 
Reduce risk, combat fraud, and keep your data secure with BILL.

Leveraging technology for ICFR management 

As financial reporting requirements grow more complex, more and more organizations are implementing specialized technology to streamline and strengthen their ICFR.

Modern software solutions can help teams manage controls more effectively, reduce manual errors, and stay audit-ready year-round.

Benefits that teams experience from implementing software to manage ICFR include:

  • Centralized documentation storage
  • Improved collaboration across cross-functional teams
  • Greater efficiency through automation and fast status reporting
  • Enhanced visibility from real-time dashboards and reporting tools
  • Simplified audits as a result of better process and documentation management 

How automation enhances internal control processes

Automation can significantly improve the accuracy, consistency, and reliability of internal controls.

For instance, automated systems can trigger periodic control activities (like reconciliation or exception reports) without manual intervention. Or, continuous monitoring can be set up to automatically provide alerts for control failures or overdue tasks, which enables faster issue resolution.

By automating repetitive tasks and enhancing oversight, teams can focus more on analysis and decision-making rather than administration.

Best practices for selecting ICFR management tools

When choosing software to support ICFR management, here are five important best practices to consider:

  1. Prioritize integration: Choose tools that play nicely with your existing tools, such as your ERP, compliance, or accounting platforms.
  2. Look for audit-ready features: Ensure that any solution you choose can generate audit trails, manage evidence, and track mediation.
  3. Assess scalability: Prioritize a system that can grow with your business and adapt to changes in compliance requirements.
  4. Evaluate user experience: The platform should be easy for control owners, testers, and auditors to use with minimal training.
  5. Prioritize vendor support and security: Finally, it's a good idea to opt for a provider with strong customer support, regular updates, and enterprise-grade data protection.

Increase internal control over financial reporting with BILL 

As financial processes grow more complex, software solutions play a critical role in enforcing controls and streamlining compliance. BILL supports more effective ICFR by:

  • Automating invoice approvals and payment workflows
  • Enforcing segregation of duties with role-based permissions
  • Maintaining audit trails and centralized documentation
  • Integrating seamlessly with ERP and accounting systems
  • Enabling real-time monitoring and exception alerts

Get started with BILL today.

Automate your financial operations—demo BILL today

Frequently asked questions

What is the role of companies in ICFR?

Companies are responsible for designing, implementing, and maintaining effective internal controls over financial reporting, and for regularly assessing whether these controls are functioning as intended.

In the case of public companies, executives must also provide formal certifications about ICFR effectiveness as part of their financial disclosures.

What is the role of auditors in ICFR?

External auditors evaluate the design and effectiveness of a company’s ICFR. This is particularly important for public companies, which are subject to Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Section 404(b). 

Auditors test key controls, identify material weaknesses, and issue opinions on ICFR effectiveness.

What is the difference between ICFR and IFC?

ICFR standards for internal control over financial reporting, while IFC stands for internal financial controls.

There is a large overlap between the two, but IFCR focuses specifically on the reliability of financial statements, where IFC more broadly looks at financial and operational controls beyond just reporting.

What is the difference between ICFR and SOX?

ICFR refers to the framework and practices employed to ensure accurate financial reporting.
SOX (the Sarbanes-Oxley Act), on the other hand, is a U.S. law that requires public companies to assess and report on the effectiveness of their ICFR.

Author
Josh Krissansen
Contributor
Josh Krissansen is a freelance writer, who writes content for BILL. He is a small business owner with a background in sales and marketing roles. With over 5 years of writing experience, Josh brings clarity and insight to complex financial and business matters.
Author
Josh Krissansen
Contributor
Josh Krissansen is a freelance writer, who writes content for BILL. He is a small business owner with a background in sales and marketing roles. With over 5 years of writing experience, Josh brings clarity and insight to complex financial and business matters.
Get more from BILL
Subscribe to finance insights and thought leadership content delivered straight to your inbox.
By continuing, you agree to BILL's Terms of Service and Privacy Notice.
BILL and its affiliates do not provide tax, legal or accounting advice. This material has been prepared for informational purposes only, and is not intended to provide, and should not be relied on, for tax, legal or accounting advice. You should consult your own tax, legal and accounting advisors before engaging in any transaction. BILL assumes no responsibility for any inaccuracies or inconsistencies in the content. While we have made every attempt to ensure that the information contained in this site has been obtained from reliable sources, BILL is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for the results obtained from the use of this information. All information in this site is provided “as is”, with no guarantee of completeness, accuracy, timeliness or of the results obtained from the use of this information, and without warranty of any kind, express or implied. In no event shall BILL, its affiliates or parent company, or the directors, officers, agents or employees thereof, be liable to you or anyone else for any decision made or action taken in reliance on the information in this site or for any consequential, special or similar damages, even if advised of the possibility of such damages. Certain links in this site connect to other websites maintained by third parties over whom BILL has no control. BILL makes no representations as to the accuracy or any other aspect of information contained in other websites.